No, but Rich Kozlovich posts an interesting thought piece on his blog about how coal might just be the most responsible way to produce socially responsible energy. It’s an interesting premise, anyway.
Tags: coal, contrarian, energy, Rich Kozlovich
No, but Rich Kozlovich posts an interesting thought piece on his blog about how coal might just be the most responsible way to produce socially responsible energy. It’s an interesting premise, anyway.
Tags: coal, contrarian, energy, Rich Kozlovich
November 27, 2008 at 4:40 pm |
Hello Frank,
This guy is one radical right dude!
Koslovich sites the Oregon Petition as the basis for is argument that “32,00 scientists” dispute the global warming theory. You’d be very hard pressed to find 32,000 scientists, let alone get 32,000 scientists signing one petition. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition, which has a very comprehensive ariticle debunking the Oregon Petition and the validity of the signatories claimed.
Gerry
November 28, 2008 at 2:28 pm |
One this one, I truly differ. Rich Kozlovich uses the Oregon Petition as the intellectual basis for his article, yet you don’t have to go farther than Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition to find out that the credentials of those signing the petition as “scientists” is very questionable. Check out the article and let me know what you think.
Regards,
Gerry