<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here They Go Again (Canadians, That Is)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fandorka.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/here-they-go-again-canadians-that-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fandorka.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/here-they-go-again-canadians-that-is/</link>
	<description>Pest Management Professional's Editorial Director Frank Andorka tells you what's on his mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Weitz</title>
		<link>http://fandorka.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/here-they-go-again-canadians-that-is/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Weitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fandorka.wordpress.com/?p=1392#comment-608</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this new law would prohibit residents from buying pesticides for do-it-yourself applications.  This would actually benefit the industry.

One of the advocates for the ban seems confused about toxins.  Everything is toxic in a certain quantity.  I&#039;m not sure what pesticides she would ban.  I see the Canadians going to an &quot;approved list&quot; of exempt pesticides that would avoid the ban, if imposed.

It seems that rational moderate Canadians will prevail.  Sensitivity bans cause major problems in the arena of property rights.  I also noticed that while these advocates what to ban pesticides that are &quot;toxic,&quot; they simultaneously want to impose a 24-48 notification.  It doesn&#039;t really seem necessary if they are going to ban toxins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this new law would prohibit residents from buying pesticides for do-it-yourself applications.  This would actually benefit the industry.</p>
<p>One of the advocates for the ban seems confused about toxins.  Everything is toxic in a certain quantity.  I&#8217;m not sure what pesticides she would ban.  I see the Canadians going to an &#8220;approved list&#8221; of exempt pesticides that would avoid the ban, if imposed.</p>
<p>It seems that rational moderate Canadians will prevail.  Sensitivity bans cause major problems in the arena of property rights.  I also noticed that while these advocates what to ban pesticides that are &#8220;toxic,&#8221; they simultaneously want to impose a 24-48 notification.  It doesn&#8217;t really seem necessary if they are going to ban toxins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
